Sue Clark’s letter to Bob McDonald, host of CBC Radio’s “Quirks and Quarks”

Hello, Mr. McDonald, I am Sue Clark-Wittenberg from Ottawa, Ontario.  I listen your show “Quirks and Quarks” on CBC all the time.

I listened to the tape of your show recently about your guest Edward Shorter discussing electroconvulsive therapy, also known as ECT, shock therapy, and electroshock.

I am an electroshock survivor.  I had ECT given to me against my will in 1973 at the age of 17 years old at the Brockville Psychiatric Hospital in Ontario.  On my 5th ECT, my heart stopped and I had to be revived.

I have started an ad campaign to ban electroshock. I have a website called “International Campaign to Ban Electroshock” at the URL: which is still being developed.  Our group wants ECT banned universally because ECT is unethical and inhumane. We want a moratorium put on the use of electroshock in Canada and all over the world.
Our group feels that “Electroshock is a crime against humanity” and that ECT is torture.

Please see the attachment of the photo of me in the ad campaign.  Crila from Montreal a professional photographer took this picture of me.

There is a large worldwide movement to ban electroshock with many other anti-ECT activists like myself.

I suffer from permanent memory loss and have difficulty learning anything new as a result of having had ECT.  Prior to ECT I had no difficulty in learning, I used to be 2nd in my class.

Edward Shorter said on your show  there is “no brain damage in ECT”  That is not true at all.

Dr. Peter R. Breggin, a psychiatrist from New York State, an author of books entitled “Toxic Psychiatry”, “Electroshock:  Its Brain Disabling Effects:” etc.
had written an article in April of last year 2007 which states that ECT causes brain damage.

Disturbing News for Shock Doctors and  Patients Alike
by Peter R. Breggin
Something most remarkable and unexpected has occurred in the field of psychiatry. Lead by a lifelong defender and promoter of shock treatment, Harold Sackeim, a team of investigators has recently published a follow up study of 347 patients given the currently available methods of electroshock, including the supposedly most benign forms–and confirmed that electroshock causes permanent brain damage and dysfunction.

Based on numerous standardized psychological tests, six months after the last ECT every form of the treatment was found to cause lasting memory and mental dysfunction. In the summary words of the investigators, “Thus, adverse cognitive effects were detected six months following the acute treatment course.” They concluded, “this study provides the first evidence in a large, prospective sample that adverse cognitive effects can persist for an extended period, and that they characterize routine treatment with ECT in community settings.”
After traumatic brain damage has persisted for six months, it is likely to remain stable or even to grow worse. Therefore, the study confirms that routine clinical use of ECT causes permanent damage to the brain and its mental faculties.

The term cognitive dysfunction covers the entire range of mental faculties from memory to abstract thinking and judgment. The ECT-induced persistent brain dysfunction was global. In addition to the loss of autobiographical memories, the most marked cognitive injury occurred in “retention of newly learned information,” “simple reaction time,” and most tragically “global cognitive status” or overall mental function. In other words, the patients continued to have trouble learning and remembering new things, they were slower in their mental reaction times, and they were mentally impaired across a broad range of faculties.

Probably to disguise the wide swath of devastation, the Sackeim study did not provide the percentages of patients afflicted with persistent cognitive deficits; but all of the multiple tests were highly significant (p<0.0001 on 10 of 11 tests and p<0.003 on the 11th). Also, the individual measures correlated with each other. This statistical data indicates that a large percentage of patients were significantly impaired.

Many patients also had persistent abnormalities on the EEGs (brain wave studies) six months after treatment, indicating even more gross underlying brain damage and dysfunction. The results confirm that the post-ECT patients, as I have described in numerous publications, were grossly brain-injured with a generalized loss of mental functions.

Some of the older forms of shock–and still the most commonly used–produced the most severe damage; but all of the treatment types caused persistent brain dysfunction. The greater the number of treatments given to patients, the greater was the loss of biographical memories. Elderly women are particularly likely to get shocked–probably because there is no one to defend them–and the study found that the elderly and females were the most susceptible to severe memory loss.

Destroying Lives

The study does not address the actual impact of these losses on the lives of individual patients. Like most such reports, it’s all a matter of statistics. In human reality the loss of autobiographical memories indicates that patients could no longer recall important life experiences, such as their wedding, family celebrations, graduations, vacation trips, and births and deaths. In my experience, it also includes the wiping out of significant professional experiences. I have evaluated dozens of patients whose professional and family lives have been wrecked, including a nurse who lost her career but who recently won malpractice suit against the doctor who referred her for shock. Her story is told on my website,

Even when these injured people can continue to function on a superficial social basis, they nonetheless suffer devastation of their identities due to the obliteration of key aspects of their personal lives. The loss of the ability to retain and learn new material is not only humiliating and depressing but also disabling. The slowing of mental reaction time is frustrating and disabling. Even when relatively subtle, these disabilities can disrupt routine activities of living. Individuals can no longer safely drive a car for fear of losing their concentration or becoming hopelessly lost. Others can no longer find their way around their own kitchen or remember to turn off the burner on the stove. Still others cannot retain what they have just read in a newspaper or seen on television. They commonly meet old friends and new acquaintances without having any idea who they are. Ultimately, the experience of “global” cognitive dysfunction impairs the victim’s identify and sense of self, as well as ruining the overall quality of life.

Although unmentioned in the Sackeim article, in addition to cognitive dysfunction, shock treatment causes severe affective or emotional disorders. Much like other victims of severe head injury, many post-shock patients become emotionally shallow and unable to relate on an intimate or spiritual level. They often become impulsive and irritable. Commonly they become chronically depressed. Having been injured by previously trusted doctors, they almost always become distrustful of all doctors and avoid even necessary medical care.

Decades of Opposition to Shock Treatment

This breaking scientific research has confirmed what I’ve been saying about shock treatment for thirty years. In 1979 I published Electroshock: Its Brain-Disabling Effects, the first medical book to evaluate the brain damaging and memory wrecking effects of this “treatment” for depression that requires inflicting a series of massive convulsions on the brain by means of passing a traumatic electric current through it. After many rejections, the courageous president of Springer Publishing Company, Ursula Springer, decided to publish this then controversial book. Dr. Springer told me about venomous attacks aimed at her at medical meetings as a result of her brave act in publishing my work. She never regretted it.

Over the years, I have continued to write, lecture, testify in court and speak to the media about brain damage and memory loss caused by electroshock (e.g., Breggin 1991, 1992, 1997, and 1998). At times my persistence has resulted in condemnation from shock advocates such as Harold Sackeim and Max Fink whom I have criticized for systematically covering up damage done to millions of patients throughout the world. It would require too much autobiographical detail to communicate the severity of the attacks on me surrounding my criticism of ECT. It was second only to the attack on me from the drug companies for claiming that antidepressants cause violence and suicide.

Given the vigor with which shock doctors have suppressed or denigrated my work, the study further surprised me by citing my 1986 scientific paper “Neuropathology and cognitive dysfunction from ECT” published in the Psychopharmacology Bulletin, noting that “critics contend that ECT invariably results in substantial and permanent memory loss.” They contrast this critical view with “some authorities,” specifically citing Max Fink and Robert Abrams, who have argued against the existence of any persistent shock effects on memory. The implication was clear that the critics were right and the so-called authorities were wrong. Sackeim was among those authorities.
Fink’s “authoritative” testimony at a number of malpractice trials has enabled shock doctors to get off Scott free after damaging the brains of their patients. Abrams used to testify successfully on behalf of shock doctors until I disclosed his ownership of a shock machine manufacturing company.

Unfortunately, the Sackeim group did not cite the work of neurologist John Friedberg who risked his career to criticize electroshock treatment. Nor did their article give credit to the published work of psychiatric survivor Leonard Frank or the anti-shock reform activities of the survivor moment lead by David Oaks of MindFreedom. They also didn’t cite Colin Ross’s 2006 review and analysis showing that ECT is no more effective than sham ECT or simply sedating patients without shocking them.

Will the latest confirmation of ECT-induced brain damage cause shock doctors to cut back on their use of the treatment? Not likely. Psychiatrist and their affiliated neurosurgeons always knew that lobotomy was destroying the brains and mental life of their patients and that knowledge did not daunt them one bit. It required an organized international campaign to discredit, to slow down and to almost eliminate the surgical practice of psychiatric brain mutilation in the early 1970s (Breggin and Breggin 1994). The ECT lobby is much larger and stronger than the lobotomy lobby, and much better organized, with its own journal and shock advocates positioned in high places in medicine and psychiatry. Stopping shock treatment will require public outrage, organized resistance from survivor groups and psychiatric reformers, lawsuits, and state legislation.

This essay will appear in Dr. Breggin’s column, “Politics, Practice and Breaking News,” in a forthcoming issue of the journal Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, sponsored by the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology (

Breggin, P. (1979). Electroshock: Its brain-disabling effects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Breggin, P. (1991). Toxic psychiatry. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Breggin, P. (1992). The return of ECT. Readings: A Journal of Reviews and Commentary in Mental Health, 3 (March, No. 1), 12-17
Breggin, P. (1997). Brain-Disabling treatments in psychiatry. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Breggin, P. (1998). Electroshock: Scientific, ethical, and political issues.” International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine 11, 5-40.
Breggin, P. and Breggin, G. (1998). The war against children of color. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press.
Frank, L. (1978). (Ed.). The history of electroshock. Available from L. Frank, 2300 Webster Street, San Francisco, CA 94115. Also available on
Frank, L. (1990). Electroshock: death, brain damage, memory loss, and brain washing. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 489-512.
Frank, L. (2006). The electroshock quotationery. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 157-177.
Friedberg, J. (1976). Electroshock is not good for your brain. San Francisco: Glide Publications.
Friedberg, J. (1977). Shock treatment, brain damage, and memory loss: A neurological perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1010-1014.
Ross, Colin (2006). The sham ECT literature: Implications for consent to ECT. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 17-28.
Sackeim, H., Prudic, J., Fuller, R., Keilp, J., Lavori, P. and Olfson, M. (2007). The cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy in community settings. Neuropsychopharmacology, 32, 244-254.

Dr. Breggin has written many articles about ECT  on his website at the


The statistics for the number of ECTs given yearly are:

Ontario – 14,000 ECTs given yearly
British Columbia – 46,000 ECTs given in the past
5 years
USA – 100,000 Americans get ECT yearly
UK – 50,000 ECTs given yearly
Worldwide – 1 to 2 million people get ECT yearly

There are many other anti-ECT activists.  In Toronto, Don Weitz and Dr. Bonnie Burstow co-founded the group called “Coalition Against Psychiatric Assault” (CAPA) The URL for CAPA is: (main website),  and the CAPA blog URL is:

CAPA held an protest against the use of ECT last Mother’s day in Toronto. see the main website (past events section) for the videos and pics of the protest.  On this website see Academic Articles section for ECT articles. The protest was a huge success. Bonnie Burstow read out my ECT statement at the protest.

Don and Bonnie co-edited the book “Shrink Resistant:  The Struggle Against Psychiatry in Canada.

Don was the guest speaker at the recently at the Are We Mad? conference held on March 1st at the University of Alberta.  Don spoke out against ECT.
Here is the link for his speech.

I had a video sent to this same conference.  Here is the link for my speech.

Wendy Funk an ECT survivor like myself also sent a video to this conference
speaking about ECT.  Wendy Funk wrote a book called “What Difference Does it Make – The Journey of A Soul Survivor).  The link for Wendy’s speech is:

The website for the Are We Mad? conference is:

for all the videos presented at the conference,  see this link:

Don and I were interviewed by journalist Jay Heisler for the Halifax Commoner newspaper recently.  Here is the link for the article:

Dr. John Breeding, a psychologist in Austin, Texas has a group called
“Coalition for the Abolition of Electroshock in Texas”.  His main website URL is::

He has a videos about protests about ECT at the URL:

See Dr. Breeding testimony to New York State:

See Leonard Roy Frank’s “Electroshock Quotationary” on the main website

Leonard Roy Frank is an ECT survivor who edited the book entitled “The History of Shock Treatment”.  See the testimony by Leonard to New York State at the URL:

Juli Lawrence an ECT survivor has a huge website about ECT, info on ECT lawsuits,  ECT testimonies etc. The URL is:

Dr. John Friedberg an American neurologist has been speaking about the harm done by ECT for years.  See the link for his testimony to New York State about the 5 lies about ECT

Linda Andre an ECT survivor has been speaking out against ECT for years and her book on ECT should be published this year.

See Linda’s testimony on ECT:

Would you be intereted in interviewing me and others about ECT? Your show needs to show the harm done by electroshock to people like me and many othyers so people in the public will know the real truth about ECT.

I can be reached by email at: or by telephone in Ottawa at 613-721-1833.

You can reach Don Weitz by email at: and Bonnie Burstow by email at: and Wendy Funk


Sue Clark-Wittenberg
International Campaign
to Ban Electroshock (ICBE)

Other ECT websites: –  year 2000 FDA alert on ECT

124K   View   Download


2 comments so far

  1. weed on

    It’s hard to find well-informed people for this topic, but you seem like you know what you’re talking about!

  2. Erin on

    I am just writing to make you understand of the exceptional discovery my wife’s girl encountered reading through your site. She came to understand such a lot of issues, most notably how it is like to have an excellent giving character to have other individuals easily learn some problematic issues. You actually exceeded our expectations. Thanks for showing the useful, dependable, revealing and easy tips about your topic to Kate.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: